SERVICES FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Services for Students with Disabilities
coordinates services for "qualified" students with disabilities who self-identify
and request services or reasonable accommodation. Reasonable accommodation(s) is(are) decided on a case-by-case basis.
I.
Services for Students with Disabilities Role:
A.
Prospective and
new students about the availability of services and how to self-identify.
C.
Maintain
confidential student files.
F.
Serve as a
liaison between students with disabilities and faculty/staff, the Division of
Vocational Rehabilitation, and other agencies.
G.
Provide activities or resource materials for
H.
Serve as an advocate for students with
disabilities.
I.
Participate in community disability related
committees or events.
II.
Faculty
Role
All
faculty are required to allow and/or to provide
reasonable accommodation for students with documented disabilities. The faculty member will:
A.
Provide or permit the reasonable and appropriate
accommodation(s) as recommended for each student as outlined in the
accommodation plan from Services for Students with Disabilities.
B.
Meet with the student to discuss the academic
accommodations that are requested or recommended by Services for Students with
Disabilities.
C.
Consult with Services for Students with
Disabilities for clarification of a student's accommodation plan and/or on any
issue related to reasonable accommodation.
D.
Maintain confidentiality of student
accommodation requests.
E.
Refer students to Services for Students with
Disabilities who request accommodations but have not self-identified or who do
not have a written Accommodation Plan.
F.
Consult with Services for Students with
Disabilities if a student with a disability exhibits inappropriate or disruptive
classroom behavior.
G.
Other than providing the appropriate
accommodations, treat the student with a disability the same as other students.
H.
Consult with Services for Students with Disabilities
and or with the Director of Human Resources and Affirmative Action officer (
III.
Student With Disability Role
Students
with disabilities are invited to self-identify.
Students who request services must provide documentation that will
support the need for services or accommodations. The student:
A.
May voluntarily disclose his/her disability and
provide current documentation of the disability, that
includes a diagnosis and information regarding functional limitations.
B.
Must meet with Services for Students with
Disabilities each semester that an accommodation may be needed.
C.
Must provide the Accommodation Plan Form to each
his/her instructor(s) and discuss the recommended accommodations with the
instructor.
D.
Should notify Services for Students with
Disabilities immediately if there is any question or dispute about a reasonable
academic accommodation request.
E.
Must comply with all
IV. Accommodations/Services
All
accommodations and services for students with disabilities are coordinated on a
case-by-case basis by Services for Students With
Disabilities in Goins Administration Building Rooms 125, 127 and 131. Assistance with disability issues is
available by appointment.
A.
Adaptive equipment
Special equipment may be available at each
campus. Students are permitted to use
campus adaptive equipment on a first-come, first-served basis. Students may use his/her
own adaptive equipment, as indicated on the accommodation plan. Use of campus adaptive equipment is limited
to people with disabilities.
B.
Applications for Recording for Blind and
Dyslexic,
C.
Extended time for tests/assignments
D.
Liaison with Vocational Rehabilitation
E.
Notetaker and Tape
recorder
F.
Priority Registration
G.
Reader and Tape Recorded Test
H.
Reduced tuition rates for permanently disabled
students
A reduced tuition rate is available for
I.
Referral to community services
When appropriate, referrals are made to
community or other agencies.
J.
Scribe or Assistant
Qualified students may have a scribe or an
assistant for lab, etc.
K.
Sign language interpreter
L. TDD
M.
Tutoring
The
College is not required to provide tutors under the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 or section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Tutors are a “personal service”
that the college provides to support students in their academic efforts. Tutors are intended to support the student to
achieve “average” grades in the subject area assigned.
N.
Academic Modifications
Students must make written requests for academic
modifications to Services for Students with Disabilities. The student must provide information related
to the specific course(s) for which a modification is requested and must also
provide written documentation that supports the student’s need for the
modification. Documentation of the need
for an academic modification must give specific, factual information that
validates the need. The documentation
may include, but is not limited to, educational/psychological testing related
to the student’s potential academic performance in the specific academic
area, transcripts of the requesting student’s history of academic
performance, statement of the requesting student’s major area of study,
and other supportive documentation.
Upon receipt of the written request, Services for Students
with Disabilities will prepare the documentation for review and schedule a
meeting of the Academic Modifications Committee. Documentation will include the
student’s name, address, college-wide identification number, specific
disability, grade point average, transcript(s), and other relevant
information. The Academic Modifications
Committee will review and decide the appropriate academic modifications, if
any. Members of the Academic
Modifications Committee include the Vice President of Learning, Director of
Services for Students with Disabilities, the Academic Department Dean of the
student’s major area, designated faculty, staff and other appropriate
individuals as determined by the Vice President of Learning. Services for Students with Disabilities will
notify the student of the final decision.
Once
a precedent-setting decision has been made regarding whether a course is
essential to a specific academic program, the Director of Services for Students
with Disabilities may request permission from the Vice President of Learning to
grant the same modification for requests by students meeting the same criteria
as those in the precedent-setting decision without calling a meeting of an
Academic Modifications Committee. In all
cases the Director of Services for Students with Disabilities will provide the
Vice President with a summary document as outlined in this policy when
requesting permission to grant the modification. The Vice President shall then have the option
of allowing the modification by the Director or calling a meeting of an
Academic Modification Committee.
Academic modifications apply only to a specific course(s) as
determined by the Committee and are only granted as long as the student’s
declared major area of study remains unchanged.
Academic modifications are specific to
V. Formal
Grievance Procedure
Any Pellissippi State student with a disability who has
reason to feel that he or she has been affected by discrimination should
contact the Director of Human Resources and Affirmative Action officer, ADA,
504 Title II and Title IX Coordinator, in the Goins Administration Building,
Room 204 or call (865) 694-6607.
VI. Services for
Students with Disabilities Office
For additional information on services, questions about
Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or about the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990, contact Services for Students with Disabilities
or the office may be accessed at the
VII. Students With a
Seizure Disorder
Students who have a seizure disorder should self-identify to
Services for Students with Disabilities, Room 131 in the
VIII.
Guidelines For Documentation Of A Specific
Learning Disability
These guidelines are provided in the interest of assuring
that LD documentation is appropriate to verify eligibility and to support
requests for accommodations, academic adjustments and/or auxiliary aids. They are consistent with current national
standards for post secondary education.
It is the student's responsibility to provide documentation
to Services for Students With Disabilities. Students are encouraged to identify
themselves to the office, but are not required to do so. If a student chooses not to reveal a
disability, Services for Students with Disabilities cannot provide services or
accommodations to the student.
A.
Qualifications of the Evaluator
Professionals conducting assessments, rendering diagnoses of
learning disabilities, and making recommendations for appropriate
accommodations must be qualified to do so.
The following professionals would generally be considered qualified to
evaluate specific learning disabilities provided that they have additional
training and experience in the assessment of learning problems in adolescents
and adults: clinical or educational psychologists, school psychologists,
neuropsychologists, learning disabilities specialists, medical doctors, and other
professionals. Use of diagnostic
terminology indicating a learning disability by someone whose training and
experience are not in these fields is not acceptable. All documentation must include the name,
title, and credentials of the evaluator.
(All reports should be on letterhead, typed, dated, signed and otherwise
legible.) It is not considered
appropriate for professionals to evaluate members of their families.
B.
Documentation should contain the following:
1.
Diagnostic Interview
2.
Assessment
C.
Tests for Assessing Adolescents and Adults
Test instruments
should be reliable, valid, and standardized on an appropriate norm group.
1.
Aptitude
a.
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised
(WAIS-III)
b.
Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational
Battery-Revised: Test of Cognitive Ability
c.
Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test
(KAIT)
d.
Stanford-Binet
Intelligence Scale (4th ed.)
e.
The Slosson
Intelligence Test-Revised and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test are primarily
screening devices which are not comprehensive enough to provide the kind of
information necessary to make accommodation decisions.
2.
Academic Achievement
a.
Scholastic Abilities Test for Adults (SATA)
b.
Stanford Test of Academic Skills
c.
Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational
Battery-Revised: Test of Achievement
d.
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) or
specific achievement tests such as:
(1)
Nelson-Denny Reading Skills Test
(2)
Stanford Diagnostic Mathematics Test
(3)
Test of Written Language-3 (TOWL-3)
(4)
Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests - Revised
Specific achievement tests are useful instruments when
administered under standardized conditions and interpreted within the context
of other diagnostic information. The
Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (WRAT-3) is not a comprehensive measure of
achievement and is not useful as the sole measure of achievement.
D.
Information Processing
Acceptable instructions include the Detroit Tests of
Learning Aptitude-3 (DTLA-3), the Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude-Adult
(DTLA-A), information from subtests on WAIS-R, Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised: Test of Cognitive
Ability, as well as other relevant instruments.
The following domains must be addressed:
1.
Aptitude.
A complete intellectual assessment with subtest and standard scores
reported.
2.
Academic Achievement. A comprehensive academic achievement battery
is necessary with all subtests and standard scores reported for those subtests
administered. The battery should include
current levels of academic functioning in reading (decoding and comprehension),
mathematics, and oral and written language.
3.
Information Processing. Specific areas of information processing
(e.g., short-and long-term memory, sequential memory, auditory and visual
perception/processing, processing speed, executive functioning and motor ability)
should be assessed.
4.
Other.
Other standard and formal assessment measures may be integrated with the
above to help support a diagnosis.
Testing must be current, preferably within the last three (3) years. An Individual Educational Plan (IEP) alone is
not acceptable documentation. Reports must include the date(s) of testing.
E.
Specific Diagnosis
There must be clear and specific evidence of a learning
disability. Individual "learning
styles," "learning differences," "academic problems"
and "test difficulty or anxiety," in and of themselves, do not
constitute a learning disability. The
diagnostician should use direct language and avoid terms such as,
"suggests" or "is indicative of." If the data indicate that a learning
disability is not present, the evaluator should state that conclusion in the
report.
F.
Test Scores
Standard and/or percentile scores should be provided for all
normed measures.
Grade equivalents are not useful unless standard and percentiles are
included. The profile of the student's
strengths and weaknesses should logically relate to accommodation request.
G.
Clinical Summary
1.
Demonstration of the evaluator's having ruled
out alternative explanations for academic problems.
2.
Indication of how patterns of the student's
ability, achievement and processing show the presence of a learning disability.
3.
Indication of the substantial limitation to
learning or other major life activity presented by the learning disability and
the degree to which it impacts the individual.
4.
Indication of why specific accommodations are
needed and how the effects of the specific disability are accommodated. A record of prior accommodation or auxiliary
aids should be provided if available.
H.
Recommendations for Accommodations
The diagnostic report should include specific
recommendations for accommodations as well as an explanation as to why each
accommodation is recommended.
Recommendations should be supported with specific test results or
clinical observations.
If accommodations are not clearly identified in the report,
Services for Students with Disabilities will seek clarification or more
information.
Services for Students with Disabilities will make the final
determination for providing appropriate and reasonable accommodations.
IX. Guidelines For
Documentation Of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
These guidelines are provided in the interest of assuring
that AD/HD documentation is appropriate to verify eligibility and to support
requests for accommodations, academic adjustments and/or auxiliary aids. They are consistent with current national
standards for post secondary education.
It is the student’s responsibility to provide
documentation to this office. Students
are encouraged to identify themselves to the office, but are not required to do
so. If a student chooses not to reveal a
disability or provide appropriate documentation, Services for Student With Disabilities cannot provide services or accommodations
to the student.
A.
Qualifications of the Evaluator
Professionals conducting assessments, rendering diagnoses of
AD/HD and making recommendations for accommodations must be qualified to do
so. The following professionals would
generally be considered qualified to evaluate and diagnose AD/HD provided they
have training and experience in the assessment of AD/HD in adolescents and
adults: psychologists,
neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, and other relevantly trained medical
doctors. A clinical team approach
containing educational, medical, and counseling professionals with training in
the evaluation of AD/HD in adolescents and adults is recommended. Use of diagnostic terminology indicating the
presence of AD/HD by someone whose training and experience are not in these
fields is not acceptable. It is not
considered appropriate for professionals to evaluate members of their
families. All documentation must include
the name, title, and credentials of the evaluator. All reports should be on letterhead, typed,
dated, signed, and otherwise legible.
B.
Documentation must be Current and Comprehensive
The following information should be included in a
comprehensive assessment: clinical summary of objective historical
information: establishment of symptoms
first exhibited in childhood and continuing through adolescence and adulthood,
and existence in more than one setting with inclusion of relevant documentation
from past educational testing and records and third party interviews, if
appropriate. A statement of current
impairment must be provided, indicating impairment in two or more
settings. Documentation should contain a
Diagnostic Interview consisting of more than self-report. At a minimum the Diagnostic Interview should
include a developmental history, family history, relevant medical and
medication history, relevant psychosocial history, relevant academic history,
relevant employment history and a thorough review of prior psycho educational
testing to document functional limitations pertaining to the an educational setting. Clear explanations of current substantial
limitations to learning or other major life activity in an educational setting
that are perceived as a direct result of AD/HD should be provided.
C.
Testing
Relevant testing information must be included. Documentation must contain relevant psychoeducational or neuropsychological testing information
that demonstrates the current impact of the AD/HD in an educational
setting. Results of a complete psychoeducational assessment are necessary including the
following domains: Aptitude testing,
Academic Achievement, Information Processing, other standard and formal
assessments measures. (See Attachment A
for a list of commonly used tests). All
standard/or percentile scores should be provided for all normed
measures. Grade equivalents alone are
not acceptable. The diagnostician must
review and include the relevant information that supports the diagnosis and its
impact in educational settings. Test
scores or subtest scores by themselves should not be the only measure of the
diagnosis. Checklists and surveys may
supplement the diagnosis but are not adequate as sole diagnostic measures. Reports must include the date(s) of testing.
D.
Specific Diagnosis
Documentation
should include a thorough investigation of alternative diagnoses or
explanations and a specific diagnosis.
The diagnostician should clearly rule out alternative or co-morbid
explanations for academic problems that may appear similar to AD/HD. There should be a clear and specific
diagnosis of AD/HD including a review and discussion of the DSM-IV criteria
used. The diagnostician should use
direct language and avoid terms such as, “suggests,” or “is
indicative of,” or “attention problems.”
E.
Recommendations for Accommodations
Documentation
should include specific recommendations of reasonable accommodations, as well
as an explanation as to why each accommodation is recommended. Recommendations must relate to the need for
accommodations at the individual’s present level of functioning in an
educational setting. Copies of an
Individual Educational Plans (IEP) or a 504 Plan alone are not acceptable
documentation. Prior accommodations in
an educational setting do not necessarily warrant the provision of current
accommodations. Services for Students
with Disabilities will seek clarification of information and recommendations
for accommodations if necessary.
Services for Students with Disabilities will make the final
determination in providing appropriate and reasonable accommodations.
X.
Reader and Tape-Recording Guidelines and
Procedures
The student must provide documentation of the disability
that supports the need for a reader or tape recording. While the provision of reader services is a
traditional means of providing accommodations, this may not be the best
alternative in today's high tech world.
There are other options available that may require less time and/or
human resources and still provide appropriate accommodation for the test-taker. One option is to have the test read onto tape
in advance. Test-takers then use the
tape in a private setting and can listen to the information several times. Another option is to allow the use of
adaptive equipment which takes the place of a live reader. Whenever possible, these options should be
explored.
A.
Readers of tests should always remain impartial
and should not in any way be affected by the student's performance on the
test. For example, the student's tutor
would not be an appropriate choice for the reader. Further, the reader should read with even
inflection in their voice throughout, so that the test-taker does not receive
any question by the way the information is read.
B.
Readers are not allowed to elaborate on test
items unless specifically advised by the instructor. The reader may simply read the item a second
or third time, but is not allowed to define vocabulary words, concepts, or give
other "hints". The student is
allowed, if possible, to go to the instructor for clarification during the
exam.
C.
Readers should maintain appropriate behavior for
a testing situation. For example, readers should not engage in extraneous
conversation during the test.
D.
The contents of the test are confidential and
neither the reader nor the student should discuss the contents outside of the
testing situation.
E.
Readers should not be currently enrolled in the
same course. If test validity is thought
to be compromised,
F.
G.
Both the reader and student must adhere to all
reader guidelines.
H.
I have read and understand the procedures stated
above and agree to abide by these guidelines:
ATTACHMENT
A
Psycho educational and neuropsychological testing
Aptitude
· Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – III (WAIS-III)
· Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational
· Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT)
Academic Achievement
· Scholastic Abilities Test for Adults
· Stanford Test of Academic Skills
· Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery –
Revised: Tests of Achievement
· Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT)
Or specific achievement tests such as:
· Nelson-Denny Reading Skills Test
· Stanford Diagnostic Mathematics Test
· Test of Written Language – 3 (TOWL-3)
· Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests – Revised
Information Processing
· Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude-3 (DTLA-3)
· Information from subtests on WAIS-R or Woodcock-Johnson Psycho educational
Battery- Revised: Tests of Cognitive Ability, as well as other relevant
instruments
Rating Scales (to be used in conjunction with other
data) such as:
· Wender Utah Rating Scale
· Brown Attention-Activation Disorder Scale
· Beck Anxiety Inventory
·
· Conners Teacher Rating Scale (ages 3-17)
· Conners Parent Rating Scale (ages 3-17)
Attachment
B
TO: Course(s):
FROM:
RE: Academic
Accommodations
NAME:
CWID:
DATE:
This
student is entitled to appropriate and reasonable accommodations that are
consistent with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990. Services for Students with Disabilities (SSWD)
staff encourage students and faculty to discuss the course requirements and the
accommodations that are recommended in order for the student to have equal
opportunity. Substantial modifications
of reasonable academic standards and essential academic requirements are not
mandated. In situations where you have questions about reasonable
accommodations, please contact SSWD staff at 539-7153, 539-7091 or 694-6751
(Voice/TDD).
Students
must contact SSWD each semester that they are requesting accommodations to
complete an updated accommodation plan.
Classroom
|
Evaluation
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
_________________________________________
Student
Signature
_________________________________________
SSWD
Staff Signature
Date
received by instructor: ________________________ Student initials: _________
Approved:
Executive Council, April 2, 1991
Executive Council, February 11, 1993
Editorial Changes, April 30, 1993
Reviewed/Recommended: President's Council, December 11, 1995
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, December 12, 1995
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, February 24, 1999
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, January 4, 2000
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, February 3, 2000
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, September 25, 2000
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, August 5, 2002
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, September 15, 2003
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, January 31, 2005
Approved:
President Allen G. Edwards, January 19, 2006
Reviewed/Recommended: President’s Staff, September 17, 2007
Approved:
President Allen G. Edwards, September 17, 2007
Editorial
Changes, July 2008