06:02:00

ACADEMIC TENURE

Introduction

Tenure is awarded only by positive action by the Board, pursuant to the requirements and procedures of this policy, at Pellissippi State Technical Community College.  The awarding of tenure is recognition of the merit of a faculty member and of the assumption that he/she would meet the long-term staffing needs of the department or academic program unit and the College.  The continued professional growth and development of faculty is necessary for Pellissippi State to continue to provide educational programs in accordance with the institution's mission, goals, and changing needs of the institution.  Tenure is awarded only to those members of faculty who have exhibited professional excellence and outstanding abilities sufficient to demonstrate that their future services and performances justify the degree of permanence afforded by academic tenure.

The quality of the faculty of Pellissippi State is maintained primarily through the appraisal, by faculty and administrative officers, of each candidate for tenure.  Tenure at Pellissippi State provides eligible full-time faculty with the assurance of continued employment during the academic year until retirement or dismissal for adequate cause, financial exigency, or curricular reasons, as further discussed herein.  Tenure is not awarded in non-faculty positions.

The following policy of Pellissippi State Technical Community College on academic tenure specifically acknowledges compliance with the Tennessee Board of Regents Policy No. 05:02:03:70 Academic Tenure for Community Colleges.

I.          Definitions

The following are general definitions of words and terms used in this policy and are further defined in the subsequent sections of this policy.

  1. Academic Tenure - a personnel status in an academic department or academic program unit of Pellissippi State Technical Community College pursuant to which the academic or fiscal year appointments of full-time faculty who have been awarded tenure are continued at Pellissippi State until expiration or relinquishment of that status, subject to termination for adequate cause, for financial exigency, or for curricular reasons.
  2. Adequate Cause - a basis upon which a faculty member, either with academic tenure, a tenure-track, term, or temporary appointment prior to the end of the specified term of the appointment, may be dismissed or terminated.  The specific grounds which constitute adequate cause are set forth herein.
  3. Financial Exigency - the formal declaration by the Tennessee Board of Regents that Pellissippi State Technical Community College faces an imminent financial crisis, that there is a current or projected lack of sufficient funds (appropriated or non-appropriated) for the campus as a whole to maintain current programs and activities at a level sufficient to fulfill its educational goals and priorities, and that the budget can only be balanced by extraordinary means that include termination of existing and continuing academic and non-academic appointments.
  4. Faculty Member - a full-time employee who holds academic rank as instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, or professor.  Further definition is in TBR Policy 05:02:01:00 and PSTCC Policy 06:01:01.
  5. Probationary Employment - a period of full-time professional service by a faculty member for whom an appointment letter denotes a tenure-track appointment in which he/she does not have tenure and in which he/she is evaluated by the College for the purpose of determining his/her satisfaction of the criteria for a recommendation for tenure.  Probationary employment provides an opportunity for the individual to assess commitment to the College and for the College to determine whether the individual meets its perception of quality and/or projected need.

Note: Faculty appointments are defined in Board and Pellissippi State Policy Faculty Appointments.

II.        Consideration for Tenure

A.     Tenure Appointments

1.       No faculty member will be entitled to or acquire any interest in a tenure appointment at Pellissippi State Technical Community College without a recommendation for tenure by the President of the College and an affirmative award of tenure by the Board of Regents.  No other person will have any authority to make any representation concerning tenure to any faculty member, and failure to file timely notice of non-renewal of a contract will not result in the acquisition of a tenure appointment, but will result in the right of the faculty member to another year of service at the College, provided that no tenure appeals remain outstanding due to lack of cooperation and/or appropriate action on the part of the candidate in completing the appeal process.

2.       Recommendations for or against tenure should originate from the department or academic program unit in which the faculty member is assigned and include appropriate participation in the recommendation by a peer committee of tenured faculty.  Peer committees have qualified privilege of academic confidentiality against disclosure of individual tenure votes unless there is evidence that casts doubt upon the integrity of the peer committee.  This policy will be interpreted in a manner consistent with the Tennessee Public Records Act, as recorded in T.C.A. Sections 10-7-503 and 504.  The recommendation for tenure must be made by the President to the Chancellor and by the Chancellor to the Board.  In the event that tenure is awarded by the Board, the President will furnish to the faculty member written confirmation of the award.

3.       The President may request tenure upon appointment for candidates with extraordinary credentials.  The exception should be requested to the chancellor when the faculty member is employed.

B.     Minimum Eligibility Requirements

1.       Academic tenure may only be awarded to regular full-time faculty members who: (1) hold academic rank as instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, or professor and meet the minimum rank criteria for the rank held under the Board Policy No. 5:02:02:30 and Pellissippi State Policy No. 06:03:00; (2) have been employed in a tenure-track appointment and have completed not less than the minimum probationary period of service as described in section C; and/or as agreed upon in writing and signed by the President or his/her designee (3) have been determined by the College to meet the criteria for recommendation for tenure and have been so recommended pursuant to this policy.

2.       Faculty members supported in whole or in part by funds available to the College on a short-term basis, such as grants, contracts, or foundation sponsored projects, may be eligible for tenure if continuing support for such members can be clearly identified in the regular budget of the College upon the recommendation of tenure to the Board.

3.       Pellissippi State may establish additional reasonable requirements for the eligibility of faculty for consideration for tenure.  These may include but are not limited to the completion of a specified degree in the faculty member's discipline.

C.     Length of Probationary Employment

1.       Faculty may be employed on annual tenure-track appointments for a maximum probationary period that may not exceed six (6) years.  A recommendation for tenure of a faculty member may be made by the President of Pellissippi State Technical Community College following a probationary period of not less than five (5) years.  Exceptions to the minimum probationary period may be made under special circumstances upon recommendation by the President and approval by the Chancellor.  Upon approval of such an exception by the Chancellor, the faculty member’s recommendation for tenure will go forward to the Board as meeting the requirements for the probationary period.

2.       When a faculty member on a tenure-track appointment completes the fifth year of the probationary period, or is granted an exception in the length of the probationary period as noted above, the faculty member is notified by the Vice President of Learning during the spring semester of their eligibility to apply for tenure during the following academic year.  Tenure eligible faculty may only apply for tenure one time, and the faculty member must apply for tenure consideration during the official tenure procedure in the academic year immediately following notification.  At the conclusion of the tenure process, the faculty member will either be recommended for tenure by the President, or will be given notice of non-renewal of the appointment following the sixth year of service.  Such notice of non-renewal should be given not later than the final day of the fifth academic year.  The faculty member's right in an instance where timely notice is not given is described in A1.

D.     Calculating the Probationary Period

Only full-time continuous service at a College will be included in determining completion of the probationary period, unless a break in service is approved.  Employment during summer terms and in part-time positions will not be credited toward satisfying the probationary period.

1.       Credit for Prior Service

a.       Credit toward completion of the probationary period may, at the discretion of the President, be given for a maximum of three (3) years of previous full-time service at other colleges, universities, or institutes, provided that the prior service is relevant to Pellissippi State Technical Community College's own needs and criteria.  Any credit for prior service which is recognized and agreed to must be confirmed in writing at the time of the initial appointment.

b.       Credit toward completion of the probationary period may, at the discretion of the President, be given for a maximum of three (3) years of previous full-time service in a temporary or term faculty appointment at Pellissippi State Technical Community College or in an earlier tenure-track appointment at Pellissippi State Technical Community College which has been followed by a break-in-service.  Any credit for prior service in a temporary full-time faculty appointment at Pellissippi State Technical Community College or in earlier tenure-track appointment at Pellissippi State which has been followed by a break in service must be recognized and confirmed in writing in the appointment letter to a tenure-track position.

c.       Tenure-track faculty who begin in January may be awarded one year of academic credit toward tenure.

2.       Leave of Absence.  The period of approved leave of absence will be excluded from the required probationary period.  A faculty member may apply for a maximum of two, non-consecutive one-year leave increments.  Exceptions may be granted by the President in writing prior to the leave of absence.  Exceptions may include:

a.       crediting the leave periods to the probationary period and/or

b.       granting more than two, non-consecutive one-year increments with approval of the Chancellor.

3.       Stopping the Tenure Clock.  A faculty member may request to “stop the tenure clock” during his/her probationary period when circumstances exist that interrupt the faculty member’s normal progress toward qualifying for tenure.  In such cases, the faculty member may request to “stop the clock” for one year if he/she demonstrates circumstances reasonably warrant the interruption.  Reasons will typically be related to a personal or family situation requiring attention and commitment that consumes the time and energy normally addressed to faculty duties and professional development.  Examples may include childbirth or adoption, care of dependents, medical conditions or obligations, physical disasters or disruptions, military deployment, or similar circumstances.

4.       Administrative Appointment.  A faculty member appointed to an administrative position may remain eligible for tenure consideration.  The faculty member must:

a.       Qualify for tenure under the College’s guidelines.

b.       Maintain a significant involvement in academic pursuits including teaching, service/outreach, and scholarship/creative activities/research.  The time or a prorated portion of the time spent in the administrative position may be credited toward completion of the probationary period.

5.       Transfer to Another Department or Unit.  When a faculty member is serving a probationary period in a department or academic program unit and is subsequently transferred to another academic unit or program the faculty member may -- with the approval of the President -- elect to begin a new probationary period on the date the transfer occurs.  If he/she does not so elect (and confirm in writing to the President), time spent in the first appointment will count toward establishing the minimum and maximum probationary period [see C(1) above)].

III.        Criteria to be Considered in Tenure Recommendations

The nature and relative importance of the criteria for the recommendation for tenure is related to the nature, mission, and goals of Pellissippi State Technical Community College and of the department in which a faculty member is employed.  The relative weight of each criterion depends upon the exact job description and assigned duties.  After the faculty member has met the minimum eligibility requirements as outlined in section B above, the primary criteria for tenure consideration are the same as those used in the faculty evaluation system developed and implemented by Pellissippi State Technical Community College.  These criteria include the following: teaching effectiveness, service to Pellissippi State Technical Community College, community service, student interaction/academic advising and professional development.  Along with the results shown on the evaluation system, an additional criterion to be considered is the candidate's ability to achieve personal objectives and objectives of the department and the College.  Criteria for tenure relate to the college’s three traditional missions:  teaching, service/ outreach, and scholarship/creative activities/research. In the community college setting effective teaching is of paramount importance.

Use of Faculty and Student Evaluations for Tenure Considerations:

  1. Instruction

1.       For the year of tenure consideration and two previous years, the faculty member will have demonstrated successful teaching or, in the case of non-teaching faculty expertise commensurate with job responsibility.  A demonstration of successful teaching experience will include student evaluations of faculty during the entire probationary period.

2.       The candidate will be evaluated during the year of tenure eligibility by a faculty committee consisting of tenured faculty.

3.       For the year of tenure consideration and two previous years, the faculty member will have made on an annual basis a significant contribution in at least one instructional area.

  1. For the year of tenure consideration and two previous years, the faculty member will have made on an annual basis a significant contribution in at least one service area.
  2. For the year of tenure consideration and two previous years, the faculty member will have made on an annual basis a significant contribution in at least one professional development area.
  3. Potential areas for significant contributions are stated as criteria in the categories listed in the Faculty Evaluation Form.  The lists are not inclusive.  Other possibilities should be discussed with the Academic Department Dean and/or supervisor.  All contributions must be documented.

The faculty member must develop a packet that includes their formal annual Academic Department Dean evaluations in combination with relevant supporting documentation for the year of tenure consideration and the two (2) previous academic years.  This packet will comprise the major input and documentation for tenure consideration.  It will be reviewed and assessed by all levels involved in the decision-making process as outlined in this policy.  Supporting documentation for categories A, B, and C, listed below, should be included in distinctly indicated appendices at the back of the candidate packet.  Guidelines on appropriate documentation may be found in Attachment I.

  1. Teaching.  Effective teaching is an essential qualification for tenure, and tenure will be granted only with clear, and documented evidence of the candidate’s teaching ability and potential for continued development.

Each of the items listed below must be submitted as evidence of effective teaching and be included in the candidate’s packet.

1.       Evidence of ability to organize and present subject matter in a logical and meaningful way.

2.       Evidence of ability to motivate and stimulate creativity in students.

3.       Statement of teaching philosophy.

4.       Course materials (i.e., course syllabi, handouts, exams/evaluation instruments, instructional materials).

5.       Results of student evaluations for every course evaluated during the probationary period.

Additional types of documentation may also include:

1.       Open-ended or other student input.

2.       Student products.

3.       Teaching recognitions/awards.

4.       Evidence of professional development in teaching.

5.       Evidence of disciplinary or interdisciplinary program or curricular development.

6.       Alumni surveys.

7.       Student exit interviews.

8.       Evidence of supervision of student projects and other forms of student mentorship.

9.       Other evidence of excellence in teaching or mentoring, or both.

A.     Service/Outreach.  Service and/or outreach encompasses the faculty member’s activities in College service, outreach or public service, and professional service.  Evidence of performance in one or more of the following activities should be submitted.

1.       College service refers to activities other than teaching and scholarship performed at the department or college level.  It is expected of every faculty member.  College service includes, but is not limited to, serving on departmental committees, advising students, and participating in College activities and on College committees.  More extensive citizenship functions such as membership on a specially appointed task force, serving as advisor to a college-wide student organization, and membership on a College search committee should be taken into account in consideration for tenure.

2.       The outreach or public service function is the College’s outreach to the community and society at large, with major emphasis on the application of knowledge for the solution of problems with which society is confronted.  Outreach primarily involves sharing professional expertise and should directly support the goals and mission of the College.  A vital component of the College’s mission, public service must be performed at the same high levels of quality that characterize the teaching and research programs.

3.       Professional service refers to the work done for organizations related to the faculty member’s discipline or to the teaching profession generally.  Service to the profession includes activities such as service on statewide or TBR committees, guest lecturing on other campuses and other appropriate activities.

B.     Scholarship/Creative Activities/Research.  Candidates for tenure must present documented evidence of their scholarship, creative activities, and/or research.

Such evidence should cite typical professional development activities such as presentations at a professional meeting, journal editorship, article and grant proposal review, performances, exhibitions, creative activities, as well as completing books, journal articles or monographs, and other appropriate activities.

1.       The scholarship of teaching is a valid measure of research capability.  It goes beyond doing a good job in the classroom; creative teachers should organize, record, and document their efforts in such a way that their colleagues may share their contributions to the art of teaching.  Authoring appropriate textbooks or chapters within a book, educational articles, making presentations, and utilization of innovative contributions to teaching, constitute scholarship of teaching.

2.       Performances, compositions, and other artistic creations are examples of appropriate creative activities.  Documentation of such activities might include written reviews and evaluations by qualified peers.

3.       Publications in journals or media of similar quality are considered indicators of professional and/or scholarly activity.

4.       Publications that are reviewed by peers are more significant than those that are not subjected to such rigorous examination.  Quality is much more important than quantity.

IV.       Exceptions to Minimum Rank Qualifications

The minimum rank qualifications should be met in every recommendation regarding appointment to academic rank and for promotion in academic rank.

V.          Tenure Guidelines and Procedures

  1. When a tenure-track employee is hired, that employee’s Academic Department Dean/immediate supervisor assigns him/her a mentor who is a senior member of the faculty (tenured with at least a rank of assistant professor) to aid and assess that employee’s progress toward tenure.  Should for any reason a mentor be unable or unwilling to serve, the Academic Department Dean appoints another mentor at the earliest possible convenience.
  2. Preceding each annual evaluation of the tenure-track employee, that employee’s mentor discusses with the Academic Department Dean/immediate supervisor that employee’s progress toward tenure.
  3. The Academic Department Dean has a specific conversation about a tenure-track employee’s progress toward tenure at each annual evaluation.
  4. During spring semester, the Vice President of Learning notifies faculty members of their eligibility to apply for tenure the following academic year.
  5. During the first week of classes of fall semester, candidates notify their supervisor of their intent to apply for tenure.
  6. By their first fall semester meeting, the Faculty Senate has reviewed the constituency of the peer group and selected the Promotion/Tenure Committee (PTC) chair(s).  Each academic department and Library Services selects a departmental representative to serve as a member of the PTC and the Academic Department Dean forwards the name of the representative to the PTC chair.  PTC members may not be candidates for promotion or tenure or members of the academic peer review group they will monitor.  Peer groups for each of the academic areas and for Library Services are composed of tenured faculty in the department or division.  A faculty member must not have been released from more than 50% of his/her teaching or departmental duties for two (2) of the last three (3) years of a candidate's eligibility to be eligible to participate in the peer review process.  The president or PTC chair forwards the final list of PTC members to the Vice President of Learning or his/her designee.
  7. The Vice President of Learning or his/her designee meets with the PTC chair(s) to discuss peer review group procedures and to establish the tenure calendar.  The calendar is published by the office of the Vice President of Learning or his/her designee and distributed to faculty members who are eligible to apply for tenure.  The PTC chair informs Academic Department Deans and candidates for tenure of the guidelines for compiling packets.
  8. Candidates compile tenure packets that address tenure criteria as outlined in the faculty job description, and according to guidelines provided by the Vice President of Learning and the PTC.  Candidates submit packets to their supervisor who verifies that guidelines for contents and format have been met and are documented.  The supervisor delivers packets to a central location on the date designated by the PTC and the Vice President of Learning or his/her designee.
  9. The PTC assigns a member of the committee to monitor each peer review group meeting.  The monitor may not be a member of the academic peer review group s/he will monitor.  The PTC peer review representative (departmental representative) schedules a meeting time and location for his/her peer review group meeting.  The representative should ensure that the PTC monitor assigned to conduct the meeting, the candidates for tenure and as many of the faculty as possible in the peer group for tenure are available to attend the meeting. The PTC chair notifies appropriate supervisors of meeting arrangements.  The PTC makes tenure packets available to peer review groups in a central location for a minimum of two weeks prior to the scheduled peer vote.  PTC notifies faculty of peer review group meeting times and locations and distributes a list of peer review group members to all faculty.  Before attending the peer review group meeting, faculty who intend to vote are required to read tenure packets and sign a roster to verify their review.  Absentee votes are discouraged; however, absentee votes will be counted if a Request for Leave form has been approved or a teaching schedule indicates a class conflict. Written requests for absentee ballots are submitted to the chair of the PTC (see Attachment III).
  10. During the peer review meeting, the monitor introduces the tenure list to the peer review group.  Candidates under consideration for tenure must be in attendance to answer any questions put forth by their respective peer group.  Academic Department Deans are invited to attend the peer review group meetings for the purpose of answering any question that may arise that cannot be answered by anyone else in the peer group.  The Academic Department Deans do not otherwise participate in the meeting or discussion.  The applicant for tenure remains in attendance to answer questions but must leave the room during the peer discussion and vote on her/his candidacy.  Prior to the vote on each candidate, there is an opportunity for discussion.  The discussion must be limited to items outlined in the job description and categories by which faculty are evaluated.  Peers then vote by secret ballots which are collected and sealed by the PTC peer review monitor.  Vote results are not announced to peer group faculty or to candidates.

In the event that a tenure candidate is not in attendance for the peer review meeting, the peer review group must agree via a simple majority vote, conducted by the PT monitor, to one of the following two options.  Options must be presented in the order listed, and voting will continue until a simple majority is reached.

1.       Vote to continue the discussion on a candidate’s application and hold the subsequent peer vote in their absence.

2.       Vote to defer discussion and subsequent vote and agree to reconvene the peer review with the absent candidate in attendance at an alternate time.  The rescheduled peer review meeting must occur before the posted deadline for the Academic Department Dean to submit written recommendations to the Vice President of Learning.

  1. After the peer review meeting, the monitor and PTC chair count the ballots and record results of the peer group votes for tenure for each candidate on Forms A and B (see Attachment II).  In the case of a tie vote, Form A will indicate that the vote was a tie.  By the close of the working day following the peer group meeting, the PTC chair delivers Forms A and B to the supervisor and a copy of Form B to the Vice President of Learning.  The PTC chair delivers all ballots to the Vice President of College Advancement to be held until the tenure process is satisfactorily completed.  By the end of the second working day following the peer group meeting, the supervisor adds Form A to the candidate's packet and orally informs the candidate of the recommendation or non-recommendation of the peer review group.  If the supervisor is a candidate for tenure, the results of the vote are sent to the Vice President of Learning.  In the case of the Library Services director, the results will also go to the Vice President of Information Services.  If a candidate for tenure wishes to withdraw from tenure consideration at this point in the process, she/he may do so.  If the candidate elects to exercise this option, it halts the tenure procedure at this phase of the tenure process, and said candidate’s employment records will not reflect denial of tenure.  The candidate may not however, reapply for tenure, and will be given notice of non-renewal of their appointment following the sixth year of service.  Such notice of non-renewal should be given not later than the final day of the fifth academic year.
  2. The supervisor adds to each candidate's packet her/his statement of recommendation or non-recommendation and forwards all tenure packets to the Vice President of Learning.  In the case of those faculty assigned to Information Services, the director of Library Services forwards all tenure packets with her/his statement of recommendation or non-recommendation to the Vice President of Information Services.  The Vice President of Information Services submits her/his written comments and recommendations and forwards them with the tenure packets to the Vice President of Learning.  If the Library Services peer recommendation differs from that of the Vice President of Learning, the Vice President of Learning will notify the Vice President of Information Services.
  3. The Vice President of Learning submits her/his written comments and recommendations to the President.  If the recommendation is negative the Vice President of Learning will also inform the candidate.
  4. The President recommends candidates for tenure to the Chancellor and informs applicants.  Candidates may appeal the President's recommendation to the TBR Chancellor.
  5. The President provides a written report of the TBR's ruling to candidates.
  6. After the Human Resources office has duplicated if necessary and filed, the tenure packets, they are returned to the candidates.
  7. Extended leave taken by candidates may affect the time required for eligibility for tenure.

XI.        Changes in Tenure and Tenure-track Status

  1. Non-renewal of Non-Tenured Faculty

1.       When tenure-track appointments of faculty will not be renewed for further service, the faculty member will receive notice of his/her non-retention for the ensuing academic year as follows:

a.       Not later than April 1 of the first academic year of service, if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if the appointment terminates during an academic year, at least two months prior to its termination.

b.       Not later than January 1 of the second year of service, if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if the appointment terminates during an academic year, at least five months prior to its termination.

c.       Not later than the close of the academic year preceding the third or subsequent year of service, if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if the appointment terminates during an academic year, at least twelve (12) months prior to its termination.

Notice of non-renewal will be effective upon personal delivery of the notice to the faculty member, or upon the date the notice is mailed, postage prepaid, to the faculty member at his/her current home address of record at the College.

Applicable dates for notice of non-renewal are based upon actual years of service at Pellissippi State and are in no way affected by any credit for prior service that may be awarded.

2.       Faculty members on tenure-track appointments will not be terminated during the annual specified term of the appointment except for reasons which would be sufficient for the termination of tenured faculty.

3.       The non-renewal or non-reappointment of any faculty member on a tenure-track appointment does not necessarily carry an implication that his/her work or conduct has been unsatisfactory.

4.       Unless there is a violation of state or federal law under the limitations described in the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) Policy on Appeals No. 1:02:11:00, decisions which are not appealable to the Chancellor include 1) non-renewal of tenure-track faculty appointment during the first five years of the probationary period and 2) denial of tenure unaccompanied by notice of termination in the sixth year of the probationary period.

  1. Transfer of Tenure

Where a faculty member is tenured in an academic program unit he/she may be transferred to another academic program unit.  The transfer is with tenure; moreover, the tenure appointment will be transferred to the new academic program unit.  In no instance may the faculty member be compelled to relinquish tenure as a condition for affecting the transfer.

When a faculty member with tenure is appointed to an administrative position, he or she will retain tenure in the former faculty position only; and provided further that a faculty member otherwise eligible for tenure who also holds a non-faculty position may be awarded tenure in the faculty position only, subject to the requirements of this policy.

  1. Expiration of Tenure

Tenure status will expire upon retirement of the faculty member.  Tenure will also expire upon the event of permanent physical or mental inability of a faculty member, as established by an appropriate medical authority, to continue to perform his/her assigned duties.

  1. Relinquishment of Tenure

A faculty member will relinquish or waive his/her right to tenure upon resignation from the College, or upon failure to report for service at the designated date of the beginning of any academic term, which will be deemed to be a resignation unless, in the opinion of the President, the faculty member has shown good cause for such failure to report.

  1. Termination of Tenure for Reasons of Financial Exigency

A tenured faculty member may be terminated as a result of financial exigency at the College subject to Board declaration that such financial conditions exist.  See TBR policy on Financial Exigency Policy No. 5:02:06:00.

  1. Termination of Tenure for Curricular Reasons

The employment of a tenured faculty member may be terminated because 1) a program is deleted from the curriculum or 2) because of substantial and continued reduction of student enrollment in a field or discipline.

Before declaring that curricular reasons exist, the President will meet with the Faculty Senate to identify the specific curricular reasons, evaluating the long-term effect on the College's curriculum and its strategic planning goals, and the advisability of initiating further action.  Before initiating the process described below, the President will present -- either verbally or in writing -- a description of the curricular reasons that may warrant the termination of tenured faculty member(s) to the Faculty Senate.  Each of these reasons must denote shifts in staffing needs that warrant greater reductions than those which are accommodated annually in light of shifting positions from one department to another or among colleges to handle changing enrollment patterns (see Definitions, below).

The Faculty Senate will have the opportunity to respond in writing within two weeks to the President prior to the action described below being initiated.

1.       Upon determining that termination of one or more tenured faculty members is required for one (1) or more of the reasons cited above, the President will furnish each faculty member to be terminated a written statement of the reasons for the termination.  Those reasons will address fully the curricular circumstances that warranted the termination and will indicate the manner and the information upon which the decision of which faculty members were to be terminated was reached.  The President's written statement will also indicate that the faculty member has the opportunity to respond in writing stating any objections to the decision.

2.       If the faculty member(s) to be terminated indicate objections to the President's written statement(s) and request(s) a review, the President will appoint a faculty committee consisting of a minimum of five (5) tenured faculty members from a slate of ten (10) tenured faculty members prepared by the Faculty Senate.  The committee will conduct a hearing on the proposed termination(s).  The committee will report its findings and recommendations to the President, who will in a reasonable time inform the faculty member(s) proposed for termination in writing either that the decision for termination stands or that it has been altered.

3.       The President's decision to terminate a tenured faculty member for curricular reasons is subject to appeal to the Chancellor and the Board as provided in the policy on appeals to the Board (TBR 1:02:11:00).

4.       When a tenured faculty member is terminated for curricular reasons, the position will not be filled by a new appointee with the same areas of specialization as the terminated faculty member within a period of three (3) years unless the terminated faculty member has been offered, in writing, reappointment to the position at his/her previous rank, tenure, and salary with the addition of an appropriate increase which in the opinion of the President would constitute the raise that would have been awarded during the period that he/ she was not employed.

5.       Upon determining that termination of one or more tenured faculty members is warranted for curricular reasons, the President will base his/her decision about which faculty member(s) should be terminated upon his/her assessment as to what action should least seriously compromise the educational programs in a department or academic program unit.

Termination for curricular reasons presumes a staffing pattern in a department or academic program unit which cannot be warranted either by comparison with general load practices within the College or by comparison with faculty loads in comparable departments or   academic program units at similar colleges.  In that light, the President will also, at his/her discretion, base his/her decision on a careful assessment of the impact of the curricular reasons on staffing requirements in the department or academic program unit as compared to overall patterns in the College and to comparable departments or academic program units.

Unless the President demonstrates that an exception should be made to minimize qualitative compromise of an educational program, the following considerations will guide (but not be construed as mandatory) the President in determining the order of faculty reductions in a department or academic program unit where termination of tenured faculty is proposed for curricular reasons:

a.       part-time faculty should not be renewed before tenured faculty are terminated;

b.       temporary faculty or tenure-track faculty in the probationary period should not be renewed before tenured faculty are terminated;

c.       among tenured faculty, those with higher rank should have priority over those with lower rank;

d.       among tenured faculty with comparable rank, those with appropriate higher academic degree(s) should have priority over those with lower degrees, and

e.       among tenured faculty with comparable rank and comparable degrees, those with greater seniority in rank should normally have priority over those with less seniority.

The President will have the discretion to deviate from this policy if he/she can demonstrate that the quality of the College's programs will be negatively impacted by strict adherence to this seniority preference.

When a tenured faculty member is to be terminated for curricular reasons, the President will make every possible effort to relocate the tenured faculty member in another existing vacant position for which he/she is qualified.  In instances where in the opinion of the President, relocation with the College is a viable alternative, the College has an obligation to make significant effort to relocate the faculty member, including the bearing of reasonable retraining costs.  The final decision on relocation is within the discretion of the President.

6.       Definitions:

a.       "Program is deleted from the curriculum" means that the College takes formal action to terminate a degree major, concentration, or other curricular component and that such termination eliminates or reduces need for faculty qualified in that discipline or area of specialization.

b.       "Substantive and continued reduction of student enrollment in a field" means that over a period of at least three (3) years, student enrollment in a field has decreased at a rate in considerable excess of that of the College as a whole and that such reduction has resulted in faculty-student ratios that, in the opinion of the President, cannot be warranted either by comparison with equivalent faculty load practices within the College or by comparisons with faculty loads in comparable departments or  academic program units at similar colleges which the President would deem to be appropriate for comparison.

  1. Termination for Adequate Cause

A faculty member with tenure or a faculty member on a tenure-track appointment or temporary appointment prior to the end of the term of appointment may be terminated for adequate cause, which includes the following:

1.       Incompetence or dishonesty in teaching or research.

2.       Willful failure to perform the duties and responsibilities for which the faculty member was employed, or refusal or continued failure to comply with the policies of the Board, the College or the department, or to carry out specific assignments, when such policies or assignments are reasonable and non-discriminatory.

3.       Conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude.

4.       Improper use of narcotics or intoxicants, which substantially impairs the faculty member's fulfillment of his/her departmental and College duties and responsibilities.

5.       Capricious disregard of accepted standards of professional conduct.

6.       Falsification of information on an employment application or other information concerning qualifications for a position.

7.       Failure to maintain the level of professional excellence and ability demonstrated by other members of the faculty in the department or academic program unit of the College.

8.       Failure to complete the requirements of the faculty development program.

  1. Procedures for Termination for Adequate Cause

Termination of a faculty member with a tenure appointment or with a tenure-track or temporary appointment prior to the annual specified term of the appointment will be subject to the following procedures.

1.       No termination will be effective until steps 4 through 10 below have been completed.

2.       Suspensions pending termination will be governed by the following procedure.

a.       A faculty member may not be suspended pending completion of steps 4 through 10 unless it is determined by the College that the faculty member's presence poses a danger to persons or property or a threat of destruction to the academic or operational processes of the College.  Reassignment of responsibilities is not considered suspension; however, the faculty member must be reassigned responsibilities for which he/she is qualified.

b.       In any case of suspension, the faculty member will be given an opportunity at the time of the decision or immediately thereafter to contest the suspension; and, if there are disputed issues of fact or cause and effect, the faculty member will be provided the opportunity for a hearing on the suspension as soon as possible at which time the faculty member may cross-examine his/her accuser, present witnesses on his/her behalf, and be represented by an attorney.  Thereafter, whether the suspension is upheld or revoked, the matter will proceed pursuant to these procedures.

3.       Except for such simple announcements as may be required concerning the time of proceedings and similar matters, public statements and publicity about these proceedings by either the faculty member or administrative officers will be avoided so far as possible until the proceedings have been completed, including consideration by the Board.

4.       Upon a recommendation by the Vice President of Learning to the President or upon a decision by the President that these procedures should be undertaken in consideration of the termination of a tenured faculty member, one or more appropriate administrators will meet privately with the faculty member for purposes of attempting to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the problems giving rise to the proposed termination proceedings.

5.       If a mutual resolution is not reached under step 4, the President will appoint a faculty committee consisting of tenured faculty members, whose appointment should be, but are not required to be, agreed to by the faculty member.  The faculty committee will conduct an informal inquiry of the facts giving rise to the proposed termination and seek a mutually acceptable resolution.  Should no such resolution be reached, the committee will recommend to the President whether in its opinion further proceedings should be taken in pursuit of the termination.  The recommendation will be in writing and will be accompanied by reasons for the recommendation.  The committee's recommendation will not be binding on the President.

6.       If no mutually acceptable resolution is reached through step 5 and/or if after consideration of the faculty committee's recommendation the President determines that further proceedings are warranted to consider termination, the following steps will be taken.

a.       The faculty member will be provided with a written statement of the specific charges alleged by the College which constitute grounds for termination and a notice of hearing specifying the time, date, and place of the hearing.  The statement and notice must be provided at least twenty (20) days prior to the date of the hearing.  The faculty member will respond to the charges in writing at least five (5) days prior to the hearing.  The faculty member may waive the hearing by execution of a written waiver.

b.       A committee consisting of members of faculty or faculty and administration will be appointed to hear the case and to determine if adequate cause for termination exists according to the procedure hereinafter described.  The committee will be appointed by the President and the Faculty Senate with each appointing four (4) members.  The committee may not include any member of the faculty committee referred to in 5 above.  Members deeming themselves disqualified for bias or interest will remove themselves from the case, either at the request of a party or on their own initiative.  Members of the committee will not discuss the case outside committee deliberations and will report any ex-parte communication pertaining to the hearing to the committee chairman, who will notify all parties of the communication.

7.       The hearing committee will elect a chairperson who will direct the proceedings and rule on procedural matters, including the granting of reasonable extensions of time at the request of any party and upon the showing of good cause for the extension.

8.       The chairperson of the hearing committee may in his/her discretion require a joint pre-hearing conference with the parties that may be held in person or by a conference telephone call.  The purpose of the pre-hearing conference should include but is not limited to one or more of the following:

a.       notification as to procedure for conduct of the hearing;

b.       exchange of witness lists, documentary evidence, and affidavits;

c.       define and clarify issues;

d.       effect stipulations of fact.

A written memorandum of the pre-hearing conference should be prepared and provided to each party.

9.       A hearing will be conducted by the hearing committee to determine whether adequate cause for termination of the faculty member exists.  The hearing will be conducted according to the procedures below:

a.       During the hearing, the faculty member will be permitted to have an academic advisor present and may be represented by legal counsel of his/her choice.

b.       A verbatim record of the hearing will be taken and a copy will be made available to the faculty member, upon request, at the faculty member's expense.

c.       The burden of proof that adequate cause exists rests with the College and will be satisfied only by clear and convincing evidence in the record considered as a whole.

d.       The faculty member will be afforded an opportunity to obtain necessary witnesses and documentary or other evidence.  The administration will cooperate with the committee in securing witnesses and making available documentary and other evidence.

e.       The faculty member and the administration will have the right to confront and cross-examine all witnesses.  Where the witnesses cannot or will not appear, but the committee determines that the interests of justice require admission of their statements, the committee will identify the witnesses, disclose their statements, and if possible, provide for interrogatories.

An affidavit may be submitted in lieu of a personal appearance of a witness if the party offering the affidavit has provided a copy to the opposing party at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing and the opposing party has not objected to the admission of the affidavit in writing within seven (7) days after delivery of the affidavit or if the committee chairperson determines that the admission of the affidavit is necessary to insure a just and fair decision.

f.        In a hearing on charges of incompetence, the testimony will include that of qualified faculty members from the College or other institutions of higher education.

g.       The hearing committee will not be bound by strict rules of legal evidence and may admit any evidence which is of probative value in determining the issues involved.  Every possible effort will be made to obtain the most reliable evidence available.

h.       The findings of fact and the report will be based solely on hearing record.

i.         The President and the faculty member will be provided a copy of the written committee report.  The committee's written report will specify findings of fact and will state whether the committee has determined that adequate cause for termination exists and, if so, the specific ground for termination found. In addition, the committee may recommend action less than dismissal.  The report will also specify any applicable policy the committee considered.

10.   After consideration of the committee's report and the record, the President may in his/her discretion consult with the faculty member prior to reaching a final decision regarding termination.  Following his/her review, the President will notify the faculty member of his/her decision, which, if contrary to the committee's recommendation will be accompanied by a statement of the reasons.  If the faculty member is terminated or suspended as a result of the President's decision, the faculty member may appeal the President's action to the Chancellor pursuant to TBR Policy No. 1:02:11:00.  Review of the appeal will be based upon the record of hearing.  If upon review of the record, the Chancellor notes objections regarding the termination and/or its proceedings, the matter will be returned to the President for reconsideration, taking into account the stated objections, and, in the discretion of the President, the case may be returned to the hearing committee for further proceedings.


 

Source: Tennessee Board of Regents, Policy No. 5:02:03:70

Tennessee Board of Regents, Policy No. 5:02:02:00
Tennessee Board of Regents, Policy No. 1:02:11:00
Tennessee Board of Regents, Policy No. 5:02:06:00
Approved: Executive Council, March 4, 1991
Executive Council, October 15, 1991
Executive Council, December 9, 1992
Executive Council, June 9, 1993
Executive Council, November 22, 1993
Editorial Changes, April 21, 1993,
Editorial Changes, July 8, 1994
Reviewed/Recommended: President's Council, March 6, 1995
Approved: Allen G. Edwards, President, March 6, 1995
Reviewed/Recommended: President's Council, May 1, 1995
Approved: Allen G. Edwards, President, May 1, 1995
Reviewed/Recommended: President's Council, September 25, 1995
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, September 25, 1995
Reviewed/ Recommended: President's Council, November 27, 1995
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, November 27, 1995
Reviewed/Recommended: President's Council, March 11, 1996
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, March 14, 1996
Reviewed/Recommended: President's Council, April 29, 1996
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, May 1, 1996
Received/Recommended: President's Council, October 21, 1996
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, October 21, 1996
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, November 12, 1997
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, November 29, 2000
Editorial Changes, May 23, 2001
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, December 21, 2001
Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, March 1, 2005 
Editorial Changes, February 13, 2006

Reviewed/Recommended: President’s Staff, October 30, 2006

Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, October 30, 2006

Reviewed/Recommended President’s Staff, March 26, 2007

Approved: President Allen G. Edwards, March 26, 2007

Editorial Changes, July 2008

 


Attachment I

 

PROMOTION/TENURE DOCUMENTATION GUIDELINES

 

Preparation of the Promotion Packet

 

Tabbed dividers are helpful but should be easily visible upon opening the binder. 

If sheet protectors are used, text pages may be inserted back-to-back.  Multi-page documentation and bulky items may also be encased in a sheet protector.  The packet should be placed in a three-ring binder arranged by sections and subsections (clearly divided) in the order listed below:

 

Academic Department Dean Verification form signed by the candidate applying for promotion/tenure

Cover Sheet with the name of the candidate, type of packet, and date of submission

 

Table of Contents

I.    Vita

II.   Teaching

III. Service/Outreach activities to the College, community, and profession

IV. Scholarship/Creative activities/Research

V.  Annual Academic Department Dean evaluation forms with goals for the year of promotion/tenure consideration and the two (2) previous academic years

VI. Appendices with documentation for

A. Teaching

B. Service/Outreach

C. Scholarship/Creative Activities/Research

 

Note: The lists below are suggestions for what might be included in the promotion/tenure packet for documentation.  Other items are acceptable.  Do not include every test, quiz, piece of student work, or thank you note.  A representative sample is sufficient.

A. Teaching: Examples of Documentation

 

Writing exercises

 

Proposal request

Course syllabi

 

Lecture notes or lecture outline

Projects

 

Lesson plan

Reading guides

 

Homework assignments/schedule

Quizzes or exams

 

Study guides

Evaluation instruments

 

Review sheets

Library assignments

 

Project overview/description

Handouts

 

Student comments/feedback

Rubrics

 

Student poems

Science experiments

 

Student songs

Research assignments

 

Photos of student art projects

Lab activities

 

Student journals/journal entries

Graphing assignments

 

Videos

Letters of commendation

 

Sample of how information incorporated into classroom

Screen shot of Web course

 

Student comments/feedback

Artist’s statement

 

Sample of student work

Description/sample of topic

 

Sample of assignment

Written student evaluation (CAT)

 

Sample of revised element

Student response (CAT)

 

Personal mission statement

Power Point slide print out or PowerPoint outline

 

Address significant events

Expanded syllabus (teacher-specific with detailed information)

 

 

 


Additional types of documentation of effective teaching:

 

        Open-ended or other student input (course feedback samples, CATs, course survey instruments for Web courses, course exit surveys,

        Student products (executive summaries, reports, graded assignments, photos of student work, class activities)

        Teaching recognition/awards/certificates

        Evidence of disciplinary or disciplinary program or curricular development

        Alumni surveys

        Student exit interviews

        Evidence of supervision of student projects and other forms of student mentorship

        Course newsletter

        Who’s Who nomination letter

 


B. Service/Outreach: Examples of Documentation

 


Copy of sign-up sheet for advising

 

Hand-written notes made at meeting

List of advisees with check marks by names of those seen

 

Handout for advising information session with hand-written notes

Map to office with office hours

 

Minutes of meeting

List of students being mentored

 

Program review or other projects

Log of student contacts/conferences – telephone and face-to-face

 

Acknowledgement by colleague for serving as a substitute

Student communication/advisement – e-mails, notes, cards

 

Copies of letters of reference, recommendations, student assistance, nominations for award

Thank you letters from students

 

Hand-written notes of event

Thank you notes/card/letters/e-mails

 

E-mail or brochure regarding activity/event/campaign

Tutor/help session schedule

 

IDC proposals

Letter of appointment

 

Grant proposals

Agenda, minutes, or program with your contribution mentioned

 

Letter/certificates of acknowledgement / appreciation / achievement

Agenda/minutes of program advisor meetings

 

Newspaper release

Committee member list

 

Brochure of math camp

Referee schedule

 

Volunteer schedule, badge

Referee badges, patches, pass

 

Program

Example of completed project

 

Abstracts

Planning report

 

Challenging teaching schedule


C. Scholarship/Creative Activities/Research (Professional Development): Examples of Documentation

 

Textbook submission letter

 

Conference materials/handouts/programs

Presentation sample

 

Honor Society membership certificate

Handwritten notes, program, brochure

 

Medals

News releases

 

Certificates of attendance

Abstracts for professional conferences

 

Photos of work

Awards

 

Portfolio of work

Grade transcript

 

Written reviews and evaluations by qualified peers

Membership card/membership directory

 

Professional exhibit program/directory

Documents contributed to a course Café

 

Notification of grant receipt

Letters of acknowledgement/certificates of appreciation

 

Publications in journals or media


 

 

 

SAMPLE ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT DEAN VERIFICATION FORM

 

I have reviewed this packet, and I certify that to the best of my knowledge the information presented herein is true and correct.

 

 

______________________________________

Dr. Jonathan Fowler

Academic Department Dean, Liberal Arts

 

 

______________________________________

Date

 

 

SAMPLE COVER SHEET

 

 

 

 

Wanda L. Scarbro

 

Assistant Professor

 

 

Liberal Arts Department

 

January 30, 2006

 

 

Applying for

Associate Professor


 

Attachment II

FORM A
RECOMMENDATION FOR TENURE
(INDIVIDUAL)

 


On ________________________ the __________________________________ peer group met

date                                          name

 

to consider the recommendation of ________________________________________ for tenure.

candidate's name

 

The peer group _________________________________________________________________

 recommended/did not recommend

 

tenure for the candidate.

Ballots Counted by:___________________________________________________________

Results verified by:____________________________________________________________

PTC Chair

FORM A Copy to supervisor to be placed in the candidate's tenure packet.


 

FORM B
RECOMMENDATION FOR TENURE
(PEER GROUP)

 

Peer Group:____________________________________________________________________

Meeting Date:__________________________________________________________________

Meeting Chairperson:___________________________________________________________

TENURE
Candidate Results (Show Numbers)
___________________________   _____ Recommended _____ Do not Rec.

___________________________   _____ Recommended _____ Do not Rec.

___________________________   _____ Recommended _____ Do not Rec.

___________________________   _____ Recommended _____ Do not Rec.

___________________________   _____ Recommended _____ Do not Rec.

___________________________   _____ Recommended _____ Do not Rec.

Ballots counted by:____________________________   ___________________________

                                                                                                            Date

Results verified by:____________________________   ___________________________

Date

Form B Copies to supervisor and the Vice President of Learning. (Candidates do not receive this form.)

 


Attachment III

Absentee Ballot Request

 

Per Pellissippi State policy “...Before attending the peer review group meeting, faculty who intend to vote are required to read tenure packets and sign a roster to verify their review.  Absentee votes are discouraged; however, absentee votes will be counted if a Request for Leave form has been approved or a teaching schedule indicates a class conflict.  Written requests for absentee ballots are made to the chair of the PTC.”

 

Name:

 

Department:

 

Date:

 

I have read the above section of the policy and procedure manual.

I cannot attend the peer review meeting for my department for the following reason (please be specific):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signed:

 

The PTC chair(s) and peer review meeting monitor will rule on this request before ballots are counted for your peer review meeting.  The ruling will be based solely on the policy and procedure statement listed above.  If your request is accepted, your ballot will be opened and placed anonymously in the stack of ballots to be counted.  If your request is rejected, your unopened ballot, along with this form, will be forwarded with the rest of the promotion/tenure materials to the Vice President of College Advancement.