I attended the summer Faculty SubCouncil meeting in 

Nashville on Friday. Here's what happened, more or less.

Dr Sidney McPhee has left the TBR building to become the 

new president of MTSU. He was, in my opinion, a great 

advocate for faculty concerns, and will be missed. An 

interim should be announced by August 1st, with a permanent 

replacement hopefully to be named by January 1st, 2002. In 

the meantime, duties of the office of academic affairs will 

be handled jointly by half a dozen capable folks.

UPDATE ON FACULTY COMPENSATION

The rules for outside employment are being reconsidered. I 

was concerned with one of the new clauses, stating that 

outside work should be related to the employee's 

school-work (I complained, for example, that as a math 

teacher, the new wording would effectively prevent me from 

teaching guitar lessons, as if anyone would pay me for 

that, but you get the point, hopefully.) That stuff's just 

under discussion, and is not yet actionable. I will let you 

know what's decided.

There is also a consideration of a modified procedure to 

give campuses the direct ability to extend counteroffers 

to try to retain employees considering leaving this 

sinkhole for greener pastures. As it stands, counteroffers 

are possible, but must go through board approval. The 

change would allow campuses to extend counteroffers at the 

(apparently) President's discretion. I thought this was a 

bad idea (relating to ill-will between have and have-not 

departments, as well as differences from campus to campus, 

as some Presidents would be perfectly willing to use this 

mechanism, but others not so enthusiastic about it.) 

Nothing will be acted on before the October meeting.

CHANCELLOR'S COMMENTS

The chancellor spoke briefly about the budget process. TBR 

is proceeding as if the current budget will not be vetoed. 

The current budget provides a 2.5% salary increase, 2/3 of 

which is to be provided by the state, 1/3 by the campuses. 

The Geier settlement is fully funded. Only 1/4 of the 

money needed for capital improvements was approved, with no 

new building allowed. All in all, the budget allows for a

5.5% increase on education spending.

I was surprised to learn that the Regent's Online Degree 

Program (RODP) was NOT funded, and the institutions will be 

assessed a fee to pay for it. The campus assessment is 

based strictly on a pro-ration of total campus budgets, and 

is not linked in any way to enrollment figures.

The Board passed a resolution based on the premise that the 

long-term budget outlook is so bad, the Board should hold a 

retreat in October to begin discussions as to how 

specifically money can be cut. One idea under consideration 

has 4-year schools getting completely out of the 

Developmental/Remedial business. There is a suggestion that 

the 4-year schools should cease their development of 

off-campus and satellite campuses, leaving such development 

to the two year schools. Most chilling for me, Chancellor 

Manning pointed out that a "natural target" is faculty 

workload. While not going into specific detail (those would 

presumably come out of this planned retreat,) Manning 

suggested that we begin to prepare ourselves for this 

debate, suggesting we lift the level of talk out of # of 

hours taught, focussing instead on broader concerns like 

student credits/faculty hour.

These are all simply ideas at this point, we will know more 

about specifics in November.

There were a number of questions for the Chancellor, most 

of which focussed on budget issues. For the most part, his 

responses can be summarized by a quote he gave (I didn't 

catch the reference,) "When facts run up against 

perception, the facts disappear." He suggested that while 

the Presidents were doing what they could to work on 

business leader's perspectives, we as faculty members would 

probably be better served by a large volume of individual 

contacts, more so than an organized massive demonstration. 

He said that we need to develop a communications strategy; 

to determine what the specific needs are, then develop a 

strategic plan for communicating those needs.

ASSOCIATE OF FINE ARTS DEGREE

This has been deferred for two years. The chief academic 

officers expressed major concerns that the hours required 

for a legitimate degree program almost force an abridgment 

of general education requirements. This degree will be 

re-addressed after the articulation initiatives have been 

in place for a bit.

EXCEPTIONS FOR PROMOTION FOR JLA, MM, MLS, MFA and the like

The Chancellor is going to discuss terminal-degree 

exceptions related to promotion (or lack of) at the next 

President's meeting. I believe that it is the opinion of 

the Academic Affairs office that the exception rules are 

acceptable as they stand, but that some Presidents may not 

be using them. If the Chancellor feels that there is any 

confusion regarding this exception rule following his 

discussion with the Presidents, he will consider suggesting 

a change to the current policy explicitly stating which 

non-PhD degrees are considered to be "terminal". Apparently 

the ETSU faculty handbook contains language on this issue 

that could be adapted for TBR policy.

REGENTS ONLINE DEGREE PROGRAM (RODP)

Despite not being funded by the state, the RODP is still 

on. The courses most in demand for this first go round are 

Spanish I, Biology, and Music Appreciation. More 

information than you could ever probably process is 

available at 

http://www.tn.regentsdegrees.org/

Of particular interest,

a)The deal with Dell is on (a purchase agreement 

between Dell computers and the students, staff, and alumni 

of TBR institutions,) and you can check out the details at 

http://www.tn.regentsdegrees.org/Dell.htm

b)Information FOR FACULTY about the RODP resides at 

http://www.tn.regentsdegrees.org/faculty.htm

including information on setting up online courses, 

software training in lots of basic software packages, and 

access to the TBR Virtual Library.

ARTICULATION INITIATIVES

Work continues on the common rubricking (I bet that's not a 

verb). A module of transferable course requirements has 

been drawn up to guarantee smooth transfer from TBR to UT 

schools; the schools are now charged with determining 

which of their courses are going to be used to satisfy the 

requirements of the modules. For example, Pellissippi has 

to determine which basic math courses meet the six-hour 

math requirements of the general UT-TBR transfer degree, 

and every other school has to do likewise. This transfer 

agreement specifically does NOT supersede the articulation 

agreements we have in place with UT in specific majors, but 

can be used by the students as an alternative. Basically, 

TBR tried to address the legislative mandate to have a 60 

hour transfer degree, but without stepping on the 

individual school's autonomy.

I feel like I have left out something, but I can't find 

anything in the 22 pages of notes I took (someone help me, 

please). I may send a brief reinforcement note tomorrow to 

prop up this creaking excuse for a report. 

dave

----------------------------------------

DAVID VINSON

Email: dvinson@pstcc.cc.tn.us

"Pellissippi State Technical Community College"