I attended the meeting of TBR Faculty SubCouncil in 

Nashville; this is a summary of major and/or interesting 

proceedings.

As usual, we started with an informal discussion amongst 

the 2-year school reps. Major topics included discussion of 

how interpretation of the 37.5 hour work week varies from 

campus to campus, and issues related to the ongoing 

development of WWW courses (for example, as fulltimers are 

forced to take low-enrollment web courses, the adjunct rate 

goes up to cover the classes fulltimers were pulled from; a 

claim was made that TBR guidelines for WWW courses 

recommend a cap of 15 students per semester, although this 

was not verified; many web-courses at the 2-year schools 

have actual caps around 50).

You think we've got problems? At Columbia St, some loophole 

in homeschool accreditation has led to the admittance of 

kids as young as 11 years old. Consider the implications of 

this regarding, for example, a discussion of STDs in a 

biology or a college orientation course. Not to 

mention the inherent behavior problem of a typical 

11 year old who acts like a typical 11 year old 

while you are trying to deconstruct Proust. They've got 

issues they are trying to work out that we could face soon.

Treva Berryman briefly discussed the ongoing examination of 

the Compass placement tests, specifically relating to the 

accuracy of the placements suggested. The Compass scores 

have been correlated with both ACT scores and course 

grades; analysis continues to determine whether our 

placement "cut points" are at the right place. TBR is 

especially concerned when the correlations are way out of 

line for isolated schools; a suggestion that minimum 

placement scores be revised upwards is under consideration.

Dr Manning spoke to the group, describing a new program 

called "An Educated Tennessee", designed to raise the level 

of education in the state. According to some national 

education policy group (my apologies, I didn't get the 

name) ranked the state of Tennessee 46th-48th in 

educational level of our population; the education rate of 

Tennessee African-Americans was described as "deplorable". 

As a minimum, TBR is advocating programs and funding 

sufficient to raise the state above the national average in 

overall education of our state.

He said that UT was trying to deal with the state's 

financial crisis by raising standards and limiting 

enrollment, but that this was not an option for TBR 

schools, as our mission pretty specifically focuses on 

accessability. He said "We carry an obligation to reach out 

to people, even of they don't know yet that they need us"; 

apparently his lobbying efforts will focus on this notion, 

that accessibility is only possible given support.

I asked him about the likelihood that phase II of the 

equity studies would be approved; he said that "I think the 

board will approve it", but then pointed out that it falls 

back on the schools to come up with the funding, and as he 

understands it, hardly any of the schools have any money to 

devote to it. So it was a mixed message, at best. 

Someone asked about the chance of a lottery bailing us all 

out and making the world a better place, but he pointed out 

that on the fastest possible track, the lottery would start 

in four years, with no new revenues until the 5th year. 

Plus, as it stands, education lottery money would be 

devoted not the running the schools, but to creating new 

scholarships. This will effectively put a squeeze on the 

schools, unless the money distribution is rethought.

AGENDA ITEMS

Copyright Issues w/regards to Web Courses

I was impressed with the first look at a document designed 

to apprise TBR personnel of all the different possibilities 

concerning ownership of materials designed for use in web 

courses. It was in the form of a flowchart, and in its 

final form, personnel will be able to go through a string 

of simple yes/no questions, eventually winding up with a 

description of exactly what forms need to be completed to 

determine ownership of the material between the author and 

the school sponsoring the course. I hope to come back from 

the April meeting with the final version of the document.

Tennessee Regents Web-Based Degree

Work continues on this; McPhee emphasized his 

commitment to a high quality program w/academic integrity 

that includes faculty in curriculum decision. The degree 

should be in place starting in the Fall.

Guideline P-080: Harassment-Sexual or Racial

SubCouncil voted unanimously to put its stamp of 

approval on this guideline for the reporting of incidents 

of harassment, following a change from "Such reporting 

should occur whether information concerning a complaint is 

received formally or informally, directly or indirectly", 

dropping the phrase "directly or indirectly". I encourage 

you to read the entire document (at the TBR website), but 

the gist of it is that ANY report of sexual or racial 

harassment MUST be reported at the earliest possible time 

to the school's Affirmative Action officer.

Guideline A-100: Basic/Developmental Studies Program 

Operational Guidelines

A decision to restrict the numbers of hours 

individual schools may offer in DSP courses was dropped 

after the academic officers subcouncil, meeting the 

previous day, couldn't come to a concensus about what form 

those limits would take. There is some concern at the state 

level that students must take, for example, a 5-hour DSM 

course at PSTCC, when several schools have an "equivalent"

course that requires only 4 hours. As a result, the changes 

to the guidelines were largely cosmetic, such as inserting 

references to Compass and deleting references to AAPP, and 

so on. The issue is not settled, they continue to look at 

it, and the feeling is that in the not too distant future, 

5 hour courses DSP will be restricted, if not altogether 

eliminated.

Update on Geier settlement

You will have to ask some of the oldtimers about 

the details of this 34 year old discrimination lawsuit. 

The involved parties have finally come to a sort of a 

probationary agreement; the guy who served as the 

negotiator in recent years now switches roles and becomes 

observer, charged with assuring that conditions agreed to 

by TBR are actually met. Honestly, though, it's a very 

complicated suit that I don't know much about; a brief 

review by someone better suited to explain it all would be 

appreciated.

___________________________________________________________

Finally, changes to three policies were approved by 

SubCouncil

Policy 3:04:01:00 Academic Services Scholarship Policy 

A requirement that high school students be in the 

"upper quartile" was removed; all references to "ACT" were 

replaced with "enhanced ACT". The "upper quartile" 

requirement was not a drop in standards; instead, so many 

high schools were failing to provide information making it 

possible to calculate the upper quartile cutoff that it 

became more of a hindrance than a help in picking 

candidates.

Policy 3:05:01:00 Out of state tuition for students who 

engage in study abroad experiences.

This probably applies more to 4-year schools, but 

the idea is that in order to encourage higher enrollment in 

TBR-based study abroad courses, we will allow students who 

otherwise would have to pay out of state tuition to be 

classified, for the purposes of these courses only, as 

in-state students. I think.

Adoption of standard GPA Calculation (I can't find the 

policy number)

A recommendation passed for adopting a TBR 

system-wide standard for calculating GPA based only on 

courses taken at the current institution. For rationale, 

beyond the standard "Everyone else is doing it, why 

shouldn't we", it was pointed out that this was in keeping 

with articulation efforts throughout the system, 

particularly in the context of the "common rubrics" 

project. Also, honors designations make more sense if the 

calculations are done consistently across the system.

*****************************************************

Then they let us get home, not finishing the agenda, 

because it was snowing pretty hard.

*****************************************************

As always, questions, comments, and concerns to be 

addressed at the April meeting are welcome. 

dave

----------------------------------------

DAVID VINSON

Email: dvinson@pstcc.cc.tn.us

"Pellissippi State Technical Community College"